I remember our history lessons. It was really hard for a teacher to explain us why we need to learn history The teacher said us that we need to learn about the past to do properly in the future. We smiled but never got that seriously.
Then we grew and met a lot of situations when it was not clear what to do. It was quite obvious that all solution we could imagine would lead to something bad. We blamed everyone around ourselves. Of course the teacher was wrong, the friends were wrong, everyone around us was wrong.
More years have gone... I started to understand that the situations I met was not so hard as I thought of them. What was different now? The experience. Yes, during the years I got some experience. This experience allowed me to solve difficult life situations.
What conclusion can I make from everything I wrote above? I can conclude that children are not quite experienced to foresee results of their actions. So they do not know which solution leads to which result. That means if children create a political organisation or adults do that for children the organisation will be hundred percent useless. It wouldn't be able to produce positive ideas. The only thing it could really do is to stress children. And it's quite dangerous to stress children. That's why I think children should not be involved in any political organisations
1. Mary washes the floor three timeS a week. 2. Can you give me some ballS? 3. Could you speak English at THE age of seven? 4. I'm sure I will BE tired in the evening. 5. There are A LOT OF (или much) furniture in the Turners' house. 6. - Granny is going to clean the window. - Really? Then I WILL help her. 7. - What are you going to do next Sunday? - My friend has invited me to his birthday party. So I'll buy a present for him. 8. Who describeD his house to you? 9. There is A standard lamp next to the wardrobe. 10. There is NO mirror in the kitchen.
enough
Объяснение: