М
Молодежь
К
Компьютеры-и-электроника
Д
Дом-и-сад
С
Стиль-и-уход-за-собой
П
Праздники-и-традиции
Т
Транспорт
П
Путешествия
С
Семейная-жизнь
Ф
Философия-и-религия
Б
Без категории
М
Мир-работы
Х
Хобби-и-рукоделие
И
Искусство-и-развлечения
В
Взаимоотношения
З
Здоровье
К
Кулинария-и-гостеприимство
Ф
Финансы-и-бизнес
П
Питомцы-и-животные
О
Образование
О
Образование-и-коммуникации

Task 5 Прочитайте отрывок из воспоминаний У. Черчилля о его школьных годах. Определите, какие из утверждений соответствуют содержанию текста (1 — True), какие не соответствуют (2 — False) и о чём в тексте не сказано, то есть на основании текста нельзя дать ни положительного, ни отрицательного ответа (3 — Not stated).

I was twelve when I entered the unfriendly region of examinations, and through which for the next seven years I had to travel. These examinations were a great test to me. The subjects which were valued by the examiners were almost always those I liked least. I would like to be examined in history, poetry and writing essays. The examiners, on the other hand, preferred Latin and mathematics. Moreover, the questions which they asked on both these subjects were almost always those to which I was unable to suggest a satisfactory answer. I would like to be asked to say what I knew. They always tried to ask what I did not know. This sort of treatment had only one result: I did not do well in examinations.

This was especially true of my entrance examination to Harrow. The Headmaster, Mr Welldon, however, took a broad-minded view of my Latin text. This was the more amazing, because I was found unable to answer a single question in the Latin paper. I wrote my name at the top of the page. I wrote down the number of the question "I". But I could not think of anything connected with it that was true. Suddenly I made some dirty marks on my test paper. I stared for two hours at these spots. And then they collected my piece of test paper with all the others and carried it up to the Headmaster's table. It was from these small signs of knowledge that Mr Welldon drew the conclusion that it was enough to pass into Harrow. It showed that he was a man who did not depend upon paper demonstration.

I was placed in the third, or lowest, division of the Fourth, or bottom, Form. The names of the new boys were written in the school list in alphabetical order. As my correct name, Spencer-Churchill, began with an "S", I was in fact only two more names away from the end of the whole school.

However, by being in the lowest form I got a great advantage over the cleverer boys. They all learned Latin and Greek and things like that. But I was taught English. We were considered such silly pupils that we could learn only English. Mr Somervell taught the stupidest boys the most ignored thing - to write simple English. He knew how to do it. He taught it as no one else has ever taught it.

I learned it thoroughly. And when in after years my schoolmates who had won prizes for writing such beautiful Latin poetry and Greek epigrams had to come down again to common English, to earn their living or make their career, I did not feel myself at any difficulty. Naturally, I am in favour of boys learning English. I would make them learn English; and then I would let the clever ones learn Latin as an honour and Greek as a pleasure. But the only thing I would beat them for is not knowing English. I would beat them hard for that. (507)

At the age of twelve Churchill had his first examination.
1 True 2 False 3 Not stated

Churchill couldn't pass the exams to Harrow several times.
1 True 2 False 3 Not stated

Besides Latin, entrance exams to Harrow included mathematics.

1 True 2 False 3 Not stated

In the Latin exams Churchill didn't answer any question.

1 True 2 False 3 Not stated

At Harrow, Churchill was considered to be the most gifted pupil.

1 True 2 False 3 Not stated

As a pupil Churchill won a lot of prizes writing English poetry.

1 True 2 False 3 Not stated

Churchill would like all the pupils to learn their native language properly.

1 True 2 False 3 Not state

👇
Ответ:
EvilVitaliy
EvilVitaliy
02.01.2020

1 - true

2 - false

3 - not stated

4 - true

5 - false

6 - not stated

7 - true

Объяснение:

4,5(30 оценок)
Открыть все ответы
Ответ:
vittoriakostenk
vittoriakostenk
02.01.2020

went to Kenya last summer. ... past simple (specific from past, past simple) I play tennis every Friday. ... present simple (routine, simpler now) He isn`t studying at the moment. ... present continuous (something does not happen / happens at the moment of speaking, continuous time is continuous) They What were you doing yesterday between 3.00 and 5.00? ... past continuous (longer activity from past - past continuous) I`ve started this exercise. ... present perfect (something has started in the past and may continue) i`ll go to university. ... future with will (spontaneous utterance in the future, future simple) Is it going to rain tomorrow? ... be going to (going to refer to the nearest plans / intentions, here it is about the weather difficult to predict) I'm visiting my grandparents next weekend. ... present continuous for future (we are a contract, that's why our intention is not going to change, it's a continuous future applied to the future.

4,6(96 оценок)
Ответ:
Gromozeka1
Gromozeka1
02.01.2020
For the history the Buddhism could become several times the state religion in this or that Asian country. Somewhere he was supported, somewhere expelled, and in some centuries started being supported again. The Buddhism as world religion endured a set of transformations, having stratified on a set of schools and currents in number of which any other world religion won't be compared to it. Opportunity to treat Buddhism dogma at discretion allowed it to unite with radical religions of many countries, having turned into a Lamaism in Tibet or a zen Buddhism in China. Exoticism of Buddhist dogma at last brought it into Europe and America where it was picked actively up by people who weren't satisfied any more by Christianity.Specifics of the Buddhism that it contains in itself(himself) lines of world religion both open system, and line of national religions - the closed systems about which it is accepted to say that they can "be absorbed only with mother's milk". It is caused historically, in the Buddhism there were in parallel two processes: - distribution in the different countries of big traditions (Hinayana, the Mahajana and Vajrayana), uniform for Buddhists of the whole world, on the one hand- and emergence of the national forms of household religiousness dictated by specific conditions of life and cultural realities with another. It is remarkable that in India the Buddhism didn't gain further development. According to statistical data for the beginning of the XXI century it is professed by less than 0,5% of the Indian population (1), what even it is less, than in Russia where 1% of the population ranks itself as Buddhists. The dominating religion of India there is a Hinduism, Islam is also widespread.
4,6(14 оценок)
Новые ответы от MOGZ: Английский язык
logo
Вход Регистрация
Что ты хочешь узнать?
Спроси Mozg
Открыть лучший ответ