М
Молодежь
К
Компьютеры-и-электроника
Д
Дом-и-сад
С
Стиль-и-уход-за-собой
П
Праздники-и-традиции
Т
Транспорт
П
Путешествия
С
Семейная-жизнь
Ф
Философия-и-религия
Б
Без категории
М
Мир-работы
Х
Хобби-и-рукоделие
И
Искусство-и-развлечения
В
Взаимоотношения
З
Здоровье
К
Кулинария-и-гостеприимство
Ф
Финансы-и-бизнес
П
Питомцы-и-животные
О
Образование
О
Образование-и-коммуникации
Kursova82
Kursova82
13.03.2023 12:51 •  Английский язык

1. Напишите краткое изложение рассказа "The Verger" (7-8 предл) 2. Передайте содержание истории, как рассказывал её Альберт Фероман.
3. Напишите план данного рассказа.

👇
Открыть все ответы
Ответ:
vanyushagay96
vanyushagay96
13.03.2023

Many people like to keep the wild animals at home, but we've ever wondered whether it is safe for us? Is what we should learn.

On the one hand, for lovers of exotic animals such as crocodiles, tigers and snakes, it is useful to get such animals in order to learn about it as much as possible. In addition, it is very exclusive to people who are fond of wildlife.

On the other hand, the wild animals are dangerous to humans. They can attack, bite or even kill. Still less can in no way infer that beast on the street, because it may cause harm to society.

To sum up, there are strong arguments both for and against holding wild animals in the home. I believe it would be best not to keep the home of wild beasts. Because they can be harmful to people.

4,6(70 оценок)
Ответ:
A11002030999
A11002030999
13.03.2023

Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In my opinion, it is absurd to argue that wild animals have no place in the 21st century. I do not believe that planet Earth exists only for the benefit of humans, and there is nothing special about this particular century that means that we suddenly have the right to allow or encourage the extinction of any species. Furthermore, there is no compelling reason why we should let animals die out. We do not need to exploit or destroy every last square metre of land in order to feed or accommodate the world’s population. There is plenty of room for us to exist side by side with wild animals, and this should be our aim.

I also disagree with the idea that protecting animals is a waste of resources. It is usually the protection of natural habitats that ensures the survival of wild animals, and most scientists agree that these habitats are also crucial for human survival. For example, rainforests produce oxygen, absorb carbon dioxide and stabilise the Earth’s climate. If we destroyed these areas, the costs of managing the resulting changes to our planet would far outweigh the costs of conservation. By protecting wild animals and their habitats, we maintain the natural balance of all life on Earth.

4,8(87 оценок)
Это интересно:
logo
Вход Регистрация
Что ты хочешь узнать?
Спроси Mozg
Открыть лучший ответ