М
Молодежь
К
Компьютеры-и-электроника
Д
Дом-и-сад
С
Стиль-и-уход-за-собой
П
Праздники-и-традиции
Т
Транспорт
П
Путешествия
С
Семейная-жизнь
Ф
Философия-и-религия
Б
Без категории
М
Мир-работы
Х
Хобби-и-рукоделие
И
Искусство-и-развлечения
В
Взаимоотношения
З
Здоровье
К
Кулинария-и-гостеприимство
Ф
Финансы-и-бизнес
П
Питомцы-и-животные
О
Образование
О
Образование-и-коммуникации

ответьте на вопросы полными предложениями . (все что есть) 1Was the life of British orphans nice in the 19th century?
2Where did British orphans usually work in the 19th century?
3Who helped to stop adults from using young kids at work?
Буду благодарна если


ответьте на вопросы полными предложениями . (все что есть) 1Was the life of British orphans nice in

👇
Ответ:
icrupnov
icrupnov
07.01.2020

The life of british orphans was so terrible because they worked on coal mines, cotton factories, etc.

British orphans worked of coal mines, cotton factories

Lord Shaftesbury helped stop adults

Объяснение:

4,5(4 оценок)
Открыть все ответы
Ответ:
dragons55u
dragons55u
07.01.2020
1) To have money- to buy a new car
If she has money, she will buy a new car
If she had money, she would buy a new car
If she had had money, she would have bought a new car
2)To buy a new house- to be cheap
If they buy as new house , it will be cheap
If they bought a new house , it would be cheap
If they had bought a new house, it would have been cheap
3/ To be offered the job- to take it
If  the job is oferred to Sergiu, he will take it
If the job was offered to Sergiu, he would take it
If the job had been offered to Sergiu, he would have taken it
4)To win the game- to train hard
If he trains hard he will win the game
If he trained hard he would win the game
If he had trained hard, he would have wone the game
4,4(60 оценок)
Ответ:
амина653
амина653
07.01.2020
At all times people were divided into different classes and subcultures. In ancient times castes were vassals and slaves, in the last century were leaders and workers, but with the advent of democracy and the mitigation of inequality, there were various subcultures. Just person more comfortable with those who think like him. Let's see what good and bad. For example, Goths. These are people who are fond of music, have their own view of things, but I prefer black clothes and a very pessimistic attitude towards life. Or emo. Such people are very peaceful and quiet, not hostile and do not want to enslave the world, but very sensitive and vulnerable, and many of them do not want to live. And what does this all mean? Everyone should have their opinion and the right to choose, be it hipster, punk or nothing. It seems to me that the question is asked incorrectly: the point is not whether these sub-cultures, and whether we need such people to the society. Well, if we don't want to be only a labour force with a serial number on the neck, in order to preserve human individuality helpful every person, except possibly for pathological. Thus, people can get carried away with anything, dress as he likes and not care about the opinions of others, may be his thing to be an outcast. The main thing is that your interests don't intersect with the interests of other people.
4,4(65 оценок)
Новые ответы от MOGZ: Английский язык
logo
Вход Регистрация
Что ты хочешь узнать?
Спроси Mozg
Открыть лучший ответ