М
Молодежь
К
Компьютеры-и-электроника
Д
Дом-и-сад
С
Стиль-и-уход-за-собой
П
Праздники-и-традиции
Т
Транспорт
П
Путешествия
С
Семейная-жизнь
Ф
Философия-и-религия
Б
Без категории
М
Мир-работы
Х
Хобби-и-рукоделие
И
Искусство-и-развлечения
В
Взаимоотношения
З
Здоровье
К
Кулинария-и-гостеприимство
Ф
Финансы-и-бизнес
П
Питомцы-и-животные
О
Образование
О
Образование-и-коммуникации
Mymail10
Mymail10
24.01.2022 19:17 •  Английский язык

с самостоятельной работой) буду очень благодарен


с самостоятельной работой) буду очень благодарен

👇
Ответ:
13372288
13372288
24.01.2022

(1)

If i had any ill teeth, I would see a dentist

If it were less expensive, i would buy a helicopter

If you didnt need oxygen, you could licve underwater

If Mary studied harder, she would get better marks

(2)

1 had, would have made

2 was, would taste

3 doesn't feel, wont go

4 took, would arrive

4,5(94 оценок)
Открыть все ответы
Ответ:
яло203
яло203
24.01.2022

ответ:English is a very popular language in the business world.

This is language of many famous writers, like Jack London and Dan Brown.

In our time English is the most common language during trips to other countries.

English has rules, which are very different from Russian, so it will be very useful to know something new.

If you travel in some beautiful places, like Cyprus, Jamaica, speak English, and everybody will understand you there.

This is a very useful to learn different languages, but start from English.

English was created from French and German long time ago.

A lot of musical bands and popular singers from many counties sing in English.

Learning of foreign languages helps to develope our brain and different skills.

The most of interesting scientific information you could find in Internet in English.

Объяснение:

4,4(24 оценок)
Ответ:
Azdes
Azdes
24.01.2022

Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In my opinion, it is absurd to argue that wild animals have no place in the 21st century. I do not believe that planet Earth exists only for the benefit of humans, and there is nothing special about this particular century that means that we suddenly have the right to allow or encourage the extinction of any species. Furthermore, there is no compelling reason why we should let animals die out. We do not need to exploit or destroy every last square metre of land in order to feed or accommodate the world’s population. There is plenty of room for us to exist side by side with wild animals, and this should be our aim.

I also disagree with the idea that protecting animals is a waste of resources. It is usually the protection of natural habitats that ensures the survival of wild animals, and most scientists agree that these habitats are also crucial for human survival. For example, rainforests produce oxygen, absorb carbon dioxide and stabilise the Earth’s climate. If we destroyed these areas, the costs of managing the resulting changes to our planet would far outweigh the costs of conservation. By protecting wild animals and their habitats, we maintain the natural balance of all life on Earth.

4,4(68 оценок)
Это интересно:
Новые ответы от MOGZ: Английский язык
logo
Вход Регистрация
Что ты хочешь узнать?
Спроси Mozg
Открыть лучший ответ