М
Молодежь
К
Компьютеры-и-электроника
Д
Дом-и-сад
С
Стиль-и-уход-за-собой
П
Праздники-и-традиции
Т
Транспорт
П
Путешествия
С
Семейная-жизнь
Ф
Философия-и-религия
Б
Без категории
М
Мир-работы
Х
Хобби-и-рукоделие
И
Искусство-и-развлечения
В
Взаимоотношения
З
Здоровье
К
Кулинария-и-гостеприимство
Ф
Финансы-и-бизнес
П
Питомцы-и-животные
О
Образование
О
Образование-и-коммуникации

задать общий вопрос к предложениям: hobbies are different because different people are interested in different things. you can learn a lot about many countries and cities. it is interesting tp grow plants and flowers in your garden. задать разделительный вопрос к предложениям: some people enjoy travelling. it is a very useful and important hobby. now young people often take up playing computer games. задайте альтернативный вопрос кк предложению: they like visiting new places and meeting new people. задайте специальный вопрос к предложению: some people love gardening.

👇
Ответ:
Ответ прост what the f*ck
4,4(59 оценок)
Открыть все ответы
Ответ:
ruchina89
ruchina89
27.11.2020

ответ: Arguments "for"

The better a person sees what is allowed and what is not allowed, the better. There will be no understatement, there will be no double interpretations. Everything is clearly described, and therefore a person will not commit illegal acts, because he will be punished for them.

If something in the law is unclear or unsaid, the criminal has a reason for the crime. He understands that most likely his action is illegal, and certainly unfair, but he sees that it is not regulated by law. Therefore, he will do so - he will commit a crime. If he is caught, there will be a court that may decide that he is guilty, or may find him innocent.

Thus, if the law does not clearly describe the rules, then no one is immune from a crime, because the criminal will have a reason to commit it. And if the set of rights and rules is complete and thorough, then the state takes responsibility for crimes on itself, and a person is freed from the need to solve complex issues independently.

Arguments "against"

Total control over a person's life is a clearly negative property of the state. It is enough to recall the countries in which there was such a thing – it will be Hitler's Germany and fascist Italy. Also, a similar restrictive set of laws was found in China among some princes, and in Africa.

And besides, no set of laws is capable of covering all spheres of human life, and there will always be places where the law can be interpreted ambiguously. Therefore, you should not expect that the law will cover all possible crimes.

Объяснение:

4,4(25 оценок)
Ответ:
Ddoj
Ddoj
27.11.2020

William Shakespeare  (26 April 1564  23 April 1616)was an English poet, playwrig and actor, widely regarded as the greatest writer in the English language and the world's pre-eminent dramatist.At the age of 18, he married Anne Hathaway, with whom he had three children: Susanna, and twins Hamnet and Judith.Shakespeare produced most of his known work between 1589 and 1613.Shakespeare was a respected poet and playwright in his own day, but his reputation did not rise to its present heights until the 19th century.

4,4(52 оценок)
Это интересно:
logo
Вход Регистрация
Что ты хочешь узнать?
Спроси Mozg
Открыть лучший ответ