1.He asked me What place in London would you like to visit ?
2. She asked What the best time of the year was in Britain?
3. The teacher asked if there were many long and deep rivers in Grat Brit-ain ?
4. They ask if I took a camera with you when we traveled?
5. She asked You were comfortable or no?
6. My friend asked if You could already speak English a little
7. Ted asked Eden Why he was asking him about it
8. She asked me Which way of travelling you preferred
9. Mary asked if the teacher would return their projects that day
10. The girl asked How She could get to Trafalgar Square
This article argues that human/dog co-habitation and the interspecies routines of walking, eating, sleeping and the emotions they create, can be fruitfully analyzed through the conceptual frame built from ‘intimacy’ and ‘rhythm’. The rhythmic analytical approach to interspecies routines, including breaks in them and the emotions these breaks create, contributes with a spatio-temporal understanding of human/animal intimacy. As intimacy is inherently a spatial phenomenon, it creates places. Intimate social relations also transform and get transformed by places. ‘Home’ is the typical example, where the iconic emplaced attachment of intimacy with the family is manifested. But the place itself does not create intimacy; instead, it is situationally formed through relations between, in this case, interspecies practices and space. By theorizing auto-ethnographical observations of everyday human/dog routines, the article explores intimacy as a particular social form. Building on recent developments in cultural geography in the field of ‘rhythm analysis,’ it is argued that while intimacy is performed in everyday life, it is foremost produced though 'arrhythmia,' in the moments when the routines are broken.
Объяснение:
2. How are they going to go?
3. Who are the three friends?
4. What is tomorrow’s date?
5. How are they going to go together?