1. At what age is best to read "The Adventures of Oliver Twist"? (Read it must be in conscious age. That's when you pay attention to the small details. Of the present situation of injustice and joy, the storm of emotions that is the story. The book teaches us to be attentive to the misfortunes of others, be careful and do not remain indifferent to the misfortunes of others.)2. What is particularly interesting? (The book is interesting in the first place that affects such an important issue - helplessness and vulnerability of children abandoned by fate at the very bottom. And I am personally convinced once again that the people - do not change. If a good man , in which scrapes will not fall, all will remain so.The protagonist - a boy, Oliver, surprising only because he can save the nobility of his soul in such difficult conditions. He was incredibly lucky (so it would be in real life). )3. What are the disadvantages of the book? (A lot of the detailed description and it seems to me unnecessary detail. In the preface to the book critics estimate precisely Dickens attention to detail. I also found it a little boring.)
1. В каком возрасте лучше читать "Приключения Оливера Твиста"? (Читать ее нужно в осознанном возрасте. Именно тогда обращаешь внимание на мелкие детали. Переживаешь моменты несправедливости и радости, ту бурю эмоций, которую вызывает сюжет. Книга учит нас быть внимательным к чужому горю, быть заботливым и не оставаться равнодушным к чужому горю.)2. Чем особо интересная?(Книга интересная в первую очередь тем, что затрагивает такой важный вопрос - беззащитность и уязвимость детей, брошенных судьбой на самое дно. А также лично меня еще раз убеждает в том, что люди - не меняются. Если человек хороший, то в какие передряги не попадет, все-равно останется таким. Главный герой - мальчик Оливер, удивительный уже потому, что умеет сохранить благородство своей души в таких непростых условиях. Ему несказанно везет (было бы так и в жизни). )3. Какие недостатки книги? (Очень много подробных описаний и как мне кажется не нужных мелочей. В предисловии к книге критики оценивают именно внимание Диккенса к мелочам. Мне же это показалось слегка занудным. )
1) Who has the right to receive assistance? 2) Where is much attention paid to schooling and vocational training? 3) The better the schooling and vocational training is the better the chances in jobs and life, isn't it? 4) Where can disabled children receive the assistance required for their optimum development? 5) Are there institutions for the mentally, behaviorally , physically disabled, those with speech and learning disabilities, for the deaf, blind and persons with impaired vision? 6) These schools consist of half-day and day schools and some with residential facilities, don't they? 7) What field do disabled persons often have to overcome particular difficulties in? 8) The choice of vocation isn't of importance, is it? 9) Do the labour offices provide special vocational advisors for disabled persons? 10) Whom is the work of vocational advisors supported by? 11) Who can help in finding a suitable training course for disabled persons? 12) What is the main task of vocational training? 13) Is integration in working life a substantial part of integration into community life as a whole? 14) What do vocational rehabilitation centres provide?
......................................