М
Молодежь
К
Компьютеры-и-электроника
Д
Дом-и-сад
С
Стиль-и-уход-за-собой
П
Праздники-и-традиции
Т
Транспорт
П
Путешествия
С
Семейная-жизнь
Ф
Философия-и-религия
Б
Без категории
М
Мир-работы
Х
Хобби-и-рукоделие
И
Искусство-и-развлечения
В
Взаимоотношения
З
Здоровье
К
Кулинария-и-гостеприимство
Ф
Финансы-и-бизнес
П
Питомцы-и-животные
О
Образование
О
Образование-и-коммуникации
alfiea7
alfiea7
11.05.2022 08:36 •  Английский язык

Reading text: Work–life balance Ronan
I work in a fairly traditional office environment doing a typical nine-to-five job. I like my job, but it’s annoying that my commute to work takes an hour and a half each way and most of my work could really be done online from home. But my boss doesn’t seem to trust that we will get any work done if left to our own devices, and everyone in the company has to clock in and out every day. It’s frustrating that they feel the need to monitor what we do so closely instead of judging us based on our task performance, like most companies do these days.
Jo
I used to do a typical five-day week, but after I came out of my maternity leave, I decided that I wanted to spend more time with my children before they start school. After negotiating with my boss, we decided to cut my working week down to a three-day work week. This of course meant a significant cut in my pay too, as I’m paid on a pro-rata basis. I’ve since noticed, though, that my workload hasn’t decreased in the slightest! I’m now doing five days’ worth of work in three days, but getting paid much less for it! I find myself having to take work home just so that I can meet the deadlines. It’s wearing me out trying to juggle work with looking after my children and my family, but I don’t dare to bring this up with my boss because I think he feels as if he’s made a huge concession letting me come in only three days a week.
Lily
I’m a freelancer and work for myself. This is great because I am in control of what I do and how I spend my time. At first, I was working from home, but I found it really hard to concentrate. There were just too many distractions around: housework that needed doing, another cup of tea, my family members wanting my attention for various things. So I started to go to a nearby café to work, but the Wi-Fi connection wasn’t ideal and I found myself drinking too much coffee. In the end, I decided to rent a desk in a co-working space with five other freelancers like myself. I liked getting dressed to go to work in the morning and being able to focus in an office environment. The other freelancers do similar kinds of web-based work to me and so it’s nice to have workmates to bounce ideas off as well.

Task 1 Choose the best answer.
1. Ronan would prefer it if he …
a. wasn’t left to his own devices.
b. could spend more time commuting and less time in the office.
c. could work from home and be judged based on task performance.
d. could trust his boss more.
2. Jo wanted to reduce her working hours because she …
a. thought she would be more efficient and productive when she was at the office. b. wanted to bring her work home.
c. wanted to go on maternity leave.
d. wanted to spend time with her children.
3. Jo is unhappy with her three-day work week because …
a. she didn’t realise how much the change would affect her economically.
b. she now hast to spend more time looking after her children and her family.
c. she has more deadlines to meet.
d. her workload has remained the same although she’s reduced her hours.
4. Why did Lily not like working from home?
a. She found it lonely.
b. Her family didn’t like her working.
c. She didn’t have a good Wi-Fi connection.
d. There were a lot of distractions.
5. What solution did Lily find most suitable for her working needs?
a. Renting an office space to work from.
b. Working from a café.
c. Working for an employer.
d. Working for other freelancers.

👇
Ответ:
alenayugova26Alena
alenayugova26Alena
11.05.2022
я не понела
4,4(22 оценок)
Открыть все ответы
Ответ:
alekskholod01
alekskholod01
11.05.2022
There is an ancient oriental tale about three smart, beloved by fate, lucky princes, wandering around the world and sometimes by chance, and more often due to their intelligence, dexterity and ingenuity, they found wonderful and useful things that they, in general, were not looking for. Princes came from the Serendip principality (as the Arabs in ancient times called the island Ceylon). There was even the term "serendipnost" - the gift of finding valuable or pleasant things that are not looking for.
Serendipnost characteristic of a true scientist. In science, they are often looking for one thing, and due to chance, a happy coincidence of circumstances and insight, they find something completely different, sometimes even more important. True, the history of science testifies that this gift, as in the ancient fairy tale, inspired and deep minds are rewarded, that only brilliant insight and excellent preparation make it possible not to indifferently pass by a happy event, but to translate it into a discovery. Thus, the case, as it were, is no longer a case, and the serendipnost is not just a happy coincidence ...
4,5(47 оценок)
Ответ:
magomedov254
magomedov254
11.05.2022

There is an ancient oriental tale about three smart, beloved by fate, lucky princes, wandering around the world and sometimes by chance, and more often due to their intelligence, dexterity and ingenuity, they found wonderful and useful things that they, in general, were not looking for. The princes came from the Serendip principality (as the Arabs in ancient times called the island Ceylon). There was even the term "serendipnost" - the gift of finding valuable or pleasant things that are not looking for.


 In science, they are often looking for one thing, and due to chance, a happy coincidence of circumstances and insight, they find something completely different, sometimes even more important. Truly, the history of science, that it is a gift, as in the ancient tale, inspired and deep minds are rewarded, that only brilliant insight and excellent preparation do not indifferently pass by a happy event, but turn it into a discovery. Thus, the case, as it were, is no longer a case, and the is not just a happy coincidence ...


We will not give examples about a falling apple, a “eureka” about the water that has been pushed out of the bath, a strange blue glow that suddenly flickered in the darkness of a laboratory closet and marked the beginning of a whole section in science. Suffice it to recall the fascinating history of the discovery and study of elements heavier than the heaviest, "closing" leaf of Mendeleev uranium, the history of the first created human synthetic elements that long ago disappeared from the face of the Earth or did not exist at all.


Actually it all started with serendipness on that sunny morning of 1935. Under the low cool arches of the ancient building of the University of Rome, young Enrico Fermi, already then a world-renowned physicist, with four closest friends and collaborators Edoardo Amaldi, Oscar d'Agostino, Franca Rasetti and Emilio Segre, frozen with amazement, contemplated the “handiwork” of a simple experimental chamber, in which, as it seemed, they had succeeded in creating new elements heavier than uranium as a result of bombardment with neutrons.


A small hermetic glass tube served as a neutron gun. It contained beryllium powder and radioactive gas — radon, which emits, like radium, alpha particles (helium nuclei), which are necessary to produce the components of neutrons. Alpha particles, about one in a hundred thousand, getting into the nucleus of the beryllium atom, combine with it, generating the nucleus of the carbon atom and releasing the neutron. Free neutrons require assistance in the training mode, allowing to penetrate into the main citadel of nature - the atomic nucleus.


Farms and other physicists by then already knew very well that the atom - the main building material of nature - is 99.999999999 percent free space. In a neutral atom, negatively charged light particles - electrons - move in external orbits around a positively charged nucleus, the volume of which is about one trillion parts of the atom and less.


In the nucleus, almost the entire mass of the atom is concentrated, and the density of its block is of colossal size (240 trillion grams per cubic centimeter) A cubic millimeter of matter with a density of life of matter would weigh approximately 100 thousand tons. If ordinary houses consisted of only atomic nuclei, then fifteen standard ten-storey houses would weigh as much as the entire globe.


It is known that the atomic nucleus consists of positive charged heavy objects of particles and prototypes. The number of protons in the nucleus determines its charge, as well as the number and arrangement of orbital electrons, which compensate for the positive charge of the nucleus, and the atom as a whole remains neutral. The number and arrangement of electrons in orbit completely determine all chemical properties of an atom, all innumerable combinations of elements, all chemical reactions that underlie an infinite variety of the living and nonliving world. These electrons and the place of the chemical element in the periodic table. The periodic system has ceased to be an empirical law of chemistry. Having obtained a reliable basis in the theory of the structure of atoms, it acquired a simple but very essential physical meaning and became the basis of the law of atomic physics. On the basis of the scientific data known today, it is perhaps not an exaggeration to assert that this is the only universal and simple enough to be universal, law of the structure of a substance discovered by man.


Even mushrooms should be sought, guided by some rule, ”the founder of the periodic law, D.I.Mendeleev, joked. The found principles of the structure of matter open up dozens of ways for people to search for and create at will new building materials of the Universe, opened the door to the magical kitchen of nature.

4,4(62 оценок)
Это интересно:
Новые ответы от MOGZ: Английский язык
logo
Вход Регистрация
Что ты хочешь узнать?
Спроси Mozg
Открыть лучший ответ