I had a terrible day last Friday. It was around 9 in the morning and I was alone as all of my family had already gone to work. I'd had breakfast but I hadn't got dressed yet. I went into the kitchen and saw that the rubbish bin needed emptying. So I picked up the bin liner and went to take it outside. I opened the front door and went along the corridor to the place where you leave your rubbish. As I was putting the bag down I felt a draught of air and heard a bang. When I came back to my flat, I saw that the door was closed. The wind had blown it shut. I put my hand in the pocket of my pyjamas, but I had left my keys inside. So I went down to the security man to phone my husband. But they told me he had gone to China for the day! I tried ringing my neighbour's door bell, but they had already gone to work. So I had to wait all day in the corridor outside my flat!
I wanted to choose "Inception", but I love space more and it's strange that despite this, I watched this movie 2 years after the release, accidentally finding a photo on the Internet. By the way, the photo was Anne Hathaway in a spacesuit, you have to admit, not knowing anything about the film, I clearly understood that he was the best ... My homage Christopher Nolan. I remember after watching, I was very surprised at the turn of the plot, most likely because I did not see the whole movie at once (because of the late time I was not allowed to do it). Speaking of the plot, it’s pretty good, it’s clear that the director tried to please both the target audience (who understands something in physics) and the new viewers, while trying to instill a second interest in the knowledge of the first, with the help of amazing physics features (by type twin paradox "arising from the special theory of relativity). I think a significant contribution was made by scientific consultant, physicist and astronomer Kip Thorn. Which was precisely the author of the idea of "making a film in which modern physical theories become the basis of the plot." From such an initiative, the film became only more exciting, especially the episode with a supermassive rotating black hole with an accraction disk, in the concept this scene is even more amazing, there should have been 3 black holes with a neutron star in a variable orbit between them (most likely Gargantua got it disk). But to simplify the perception of the viewer in the animation, only Gargantua remained. Speaking of graphics, Christopher Nolan tries to use it to a minimum (so that the film withstands the test of time), so most of the special effects were shot using miniatures, full-size models and projections. And even where, without graphics, it’s not like, Kip, along with Pavel Franklin’s visual effects department, showed Gargantua with great responsibility in accordance with the physical and mathematical model, for which the film received an Oscar. All this in conjunction with the stunning acting and atmospheric music of Hans Zimmer gives the movie the magic you believe in ... That is why interestllar for me is the favorite and only film that satisfies the sensation of space as the biggest adventure ...
ответ: Am Is Are - это формы настоящего времени глагола to be
Если подлежащее выражено местоимением I (я), то употребляем глагол am - I am...
Are берётся с подлежащим, выраженным существительным или местоимением во множественном числе: We are; you are; they are (мы, вы (ты), они.)
С подлежащим, выраженным существительным или местоимением в третьем лице единственного числа (он, она, оно) употребляем глагол is:
He is; she is; it is.