Единый язык для всей планеты. За и против
No doubt that learning languages takes up a lot of time. That is why some people think that it would be better to have only one language on our planet. But will it be really beneficial for mankind?
In my opinion, the reduction of the number of languages is a disaster because it will totally destroy our great cultural heritage. With each loss of a language comes a loss of a culture, a loss of a way of life that deserves to be protected and treated as valuable. I also believe that leaving one language for communication will greatly reduce the linguistic diversity of our planet, which is the key to our survival. On the other hand, it will be rather difficult to choose which language to use and it may even lead to wars.
To start with, is that any human might think that if we have only one language, communication will become easier and there will be no need to learn foreign languages. Secondly, I cannot agree with them because knowledge of foreign languages makes a person educated and well rounded. You cannot broaden your mind if you see the world only from the perspective of your own culture. As a result, people are a lot more helpful if you speak their language.
On conclusion, I would argue that we should try our best to preserve the linguistic diversity of our planet. I think that larger cultures should have a respect for minority languages, but first of all the younger generation must want to preserve their native language.
translate sentences into English and combine them with phrases so that you get one sentence: 1 He answered the questions in more detail than others / most of all; 2 I least liked their site / least of all; It seemed to us that he paid too much attention to this problem / too much; These issues are more important and we'd better discuss them now / much more important; We least expected interference from these authorities / much less expensive; The goods offered by the Italian company were a little cheaper / in a more detailed way
Объяснение: