1)Мы поймаем поезд, если мы поторопимся.
2) Не могли бы вы пойти на каток, если он попросит вас?
3) Если вы его видите, попросите его позвонить мне.
4) Она бы не пошла в парк, если было очень холодно.
5) Если бы мы пошли в лес, мы бы выбрали там много ягод.
6) Куда вы должны пойти, если вы нездоровы?
7) Что вы наденете, если погода очень холодная?
8) Какие достопримечательности вы бы посетили, если бы отправились в Лондон?
9) Куда бы вы пошли, если бы у вас были более длительные каникулы?
10) Что бы вы купили, если бы пошли в продуктовый магазин?
According to the laws of my country, the 1st and 3rd case is most suitable to start a divorcing process.
In the first case, the husband hasn't supplied the family with anything, left his wife with children, even though he has money to at least send them financial aid once a month, that is, assuming the info about oil-company is true. According to the law, Mrs Manroe, if not divorced, has rights to demand financial aid from her husband, with whom she's still officially married.
In the third case, the violence against another human being, let alone against oneself's house spouse is enough to file a lawsuit, because it is the violation of human rights (if it wasn't used as a self-defence mechanism). But according to the information that Bob Tanner was a drug user, we can conclude that the aggressiveness towards his wife was most likely intended to harm her. His deeds threatened her life, physical and mental state, so she/lawyer can start a divorcing process to save wife's life and avoid such situations in the future.
He tells me he has possibility to visit his granny.
We say to him that he is stupid.
They said they had decided.
He said he would read the novel.
They said they had been in Paris.
They asked him if he worked in the office.
She asked them if they had been to America.
They asked her where she was going.