Make the following sentences interrogative and negative: 1.a decided case constitutes a precedent. 2.in his decision the judge has used a process of analogy. 3.the common law was built up by generations of judges. 4.the king exercised his personal power of justice.
1. A decided case doesn't constitute a precedent.
2. In his decision the judge hasn't used a process of analogy.
3. The common law wasn't built up by generations of judges.
4. The King didn't exercise his personal power of justice.
1. Does a decided case constitute a precedent?
2. Has the judge used a process of analogy in his decision?
3. Was the common law built up by generations of judges?
4. Did the King exercise his personal power of justice?