Перевод на selection of the trial jury the first step in the selection of the trial jury is the selection of a ‘jury panel’. when you are selected for a jury panel you will be directed to report, along with other panel members, to a courtroom in which a case is to be heard once a jury is selected. the judge assigned to that case will tell you about the case and will introduce the lawyers and the people involved in the case you will also take an oath, by which you promise to answer all questions truthfully. following this explanation of the case and the taking of the oath, the judge and the lawyers will question you and the other members of the panel to find out if you have any personal interest in it, or any feelings that might make it hard for you to be impartial. this process of questioning is called voir dire, a phrase meaning “to speak the truth”. many of the questions the judge and lawyers ask you during voir dire may seem very personal to you, but you should answer them completely and honestly. remember that the lawyers are not trying to embarrass you, but are trying to make sure that members of the jury do not have opinions or past experiences which might prevent them from making an impartial decision. during voir dire the lawyers may ask the judge to excuse you or another member of the panel from sitting on the jury for this particular case. this is called challenging a juror. there are two types of challenges. the first is called a challenge for cause, which means that the lawyer has a specific reason for thinking that the juror would not be able to be impartial. for example, the case may involve the theft of a car. if one of the jurors has had a car stolen and still feels angry or upset about it, the lawyer for the person accused of the theft could ask that the juror be excused for that reason. there is no limit on the number of the panel members that the lawyers may have excused for cause. the second type of challenge is called a peremptory challenge, which means that the lawyer does not have to state a reason for asking that the juror be excused. like challenges for cause, peremptory challenges are designed to allow lawyers to do their best to assure that their clients will have a fair trial. unlike challenges for cause, however, the number of peremptory challenges is limited. please try not to take offence if you are excused from serving on a particular jury. the lawyer who challenges you is not suggesting that you lack ability or honesty, merely that there is same doubt about your impartiality because of the circumstances of the particular case and your past experiences. if you are excused, you will either return to the juror waiting area and wait to be called for another panel or will be excused from service, depending on the local procedures in the county in which you live. those jurors who have not been challenged become the jury for the case. depending on the kind of case, there will be either six or twelve jurors. the judge may also allow selection of one or more alternate jurors, who will serve if one of the jurors is unable to do so because of illness or some other reason.
