Many kinds of sports are extremely violent, however this does not stop people watching, doing or playing them. Should violent sports be banned or are they just a way for people to enjoy themselves? There are some arguments for banning violent sports. Firstly, some of these sports are simply an excuse for violence. There is enough violence in our world without seeing sportsmen getting hurt over TV. In addition, people who take part in violent sports often run risk of getting serious injury or even death. Many young boxers, for example, are seriously injured every year. On the other hand, there are some disadvantages to banning violent sports. To start with, violent sports can be a healthy way for people to relax and 'let off steam'. As a result, general aggression and violence in society will be can be reduced. Moreover, instead of banning violents sports, we can improve their safety standards, for instance, by using better protective clothing and equipment. Consequently, sports injuries will be reduced. In conclusion, there are arguments both for and against banning violent sports. I strongly believe violent games should be banned, as I feel they are not going to help people to live together peacefully.
He was born in Stockholm on October 21, 1833 but moved to Russia with his parents in 1842, where his father made a strong position for himself in the engineering industry. Most of the family returned to Sweden in 1859, where Alfred rejoined them in 1863, beginning his own study of explosions in his father's laboratory. He had never been to school or university but had studied privately and by the time he was twenty he was a skillful chemist and excellent linguistics, speaking Swedish, Russian, German, French and English. He builds up over 80 companies in 20 different countries.
Суперфаер ( superfair ). В свободное от геройства время, это обычный высокий мальчик с коричневыми волосами и красными глазами. Его зовут . Он любит химию. Занимается скалолазаньем. Но как только в его город приходит опасность он одевается маску и идёт людей. Его супер заключается в том, что он может становиться огем. Он полностью огнеустойчив. Так же он очень быстро бегает и высоко прыгает. В основном он людей из пожаров. Но если он видит какую-нибудь иную опасность, то не примерно
Many kinds of sports are extremely violent, however this does not stop people watching, doing or playing them. Should violent sports be banned or are they just a way for people to enjoy themselves? There are some arguments for banning violent sports. Firstly, some of these sports are simply an excuse for violence. There is enough violence in our world without seeing sportsmen getting hurt over TV. In addition, people who take part in violent sports often run risk of getting serious injury or even death. Many young boxers, for example, are seriously injured every year. On the other hand, there are some disadvantages to banning violent sports. To start with, violent sports can be a healthy way for people to relax and 'let off steam'. As a result, general aggression and violence in society will be can be reduced. Moreover, instead of banning violents sports, we can improve their safety standards, for instance, by using better protective clothing and equipment. Consequently, sports injuries will be reduced. In conclusion, there are arguments both for and against banning violent sports. I strongly believe violent games should be banned, as I feel they are not going to help people to live together peacefully.