To start with, nowadays there are lots of hot debates about computers in the school. Some people strongly assure that they could replace teachers, however, others disagree, singling out that new technologies have a great deal of drawbacks. I definitely stand for the second point of view. My first argument is that computers are quite harmful not only for the eyes of children, but for thier nervous system too. Because of this they become agressive, tired and cannot concentrate on the work. Furthermore, pupils can misuse computers: it is possible to chat or play the games instead of learning. What is more, today it is very dangerous to rely on computers. If it breaks down, your information will be lost. However, there are some people who are fully against it. They point out that with computers it is simply enough to make tests and check them. I agree up to the point, but it must be taken into consideration that in this way pupils have more possibilities to answer with the help of classmates and there is nobody to control them. Moreover, they are trying to persuade that that computer can manage every work you want it to do. I strongly disagree, as I do believe, that only the teacher could explain difficult problems to the children, so that they understand it. To sum up, it is not an easy question to answer and opinions are different. Personally I am in favour of learning with the help of teachers. To my mind, nothing could take their place.
I remember our history lessons. It was really hard for a teacher to explain us why we need to learn history The teacher said us that we need to learn about the past to do properly in the future. We smiled but never got that seriously.
Then we grew and met a lot of situations when it was not clear what to do. It was quite obvious that all solution we could imagine would lead to something bad. We blamed everyone around ourselves. Of course the teacher was wrong, the friends were wrong, everyone around us was wrong.
More years have gone... I started to understand that the situations I met was not so hard as I thought of them. What was different now? The experience. Yes, during the years I got some experience. This experience allowed me to solve difficult life situations.
What conclusion can I make from everything I wrote above? I can conclude that children are not quite experienced to foresee results of their actions. So they do not know which solution leads to which result. That means if children create a political organisation or adults do that for children the organisation will be hundred percent useless. It wouldn't be able to produce positive ideas. The only thing it could really do is to stress children. And it's quite dangerous to stress children. That's why I think children should not be involved in any political organisations
I definitely stand for the second point of view. My first argument is that computers are quite harmful not only for the eyes of children, but for thier nervous system too. Because of this they become agressive, tired and cannot concentrate on the work. Furthermore, pupils can misuse computers: it is possible to chat or play the games instead of learning. What is more, today it is very dangerous to rely on computers. If it breaks down, your information will be lost. However, there are some people who are fully against it. They point out that with computers it is simply enough to make tests and check them. I agree up to the point, but it must be taken into consideration that in this way pupils have more possibilities to answer with the help of classmates and there is nobody to control them. Moreover, they are trying to persuade that that computer can manage every work you want it to do. I strongly disagree, as I do believe, that only the teacher could explain difficult problems to the children, so that they understand it. To sum up, it is not an easy question to answer and opinions are different. Personally I am in favour of learning with the help of teachers. To my mind, nothing could take their place.